Volume 6, Issue 2 (Journal of Clinical and Basic Research (JCBR) 2022)                   jcbr 2022, 6(2): 36-44 | Back to browse issues page

Ethics code: IR.GOUMS.REC.1395.260

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Kalantari S, Chehrehgosha M, Royani Z, Seyedghasemi N, Mehdinejad M H. Determination of Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene and Xylene Compounds in Surgical Smoke and Its Relationship with Body Mass Index and Duration of Surgery. jcbr 2022; 6 (2) :36-44
URL: http://jcbr.goums.ac.ir/article-1-362-en.html
1- PhD Candidate in Nursing, Student Research Committee, Laboratory Sciences Research Center, Faculty of Paramedical Sciences, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran
2- PhD in Gerontology, Faculty of Paramedical Sciences, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran
3- Laboratory Sciences Research Center, Faculty of Paramedical Sciences, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran
4- PhD in Biostatistics, Faculty of Health, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran
5- Environmental Health Research Center, Department of Environmental Health Engineering, Faculty of Health, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran , hmnejad@yahoo.com
Abstract:   (602 Views)
Background and objectives: Electrosurgical units produce the highest level of surgical smoke. Therefore, the present study aimed to determine concentration of surgical smoke compounds produced in orthopedic surgeries.
Methods: The present study was performed on 20 patients in the operating room units of 5 Azar Hospital in Gorgan, Iran. Twenty smoke specimens were collected from electrosurgical units during orthopedic surgeries. The concentration of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene (BTEX) was determined using an air-sampling pump and SKC charcoal sorbent tubes. The collected data were analyzed using frequency distribution as well as generalized linear and ranked logistic regression tests in SPSS software (version 17).
Results: Most patients had a body mass index (BMI) level of >24 kg/m2. The mean age of patients was 25.28 years. The average concentrations of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene were 540 µg/m3, 430 µg/m3, and 340µg/m3, and 390µg/m3, respectively. The concentration of particles with an aerodynamic diameter of 2.5 μm or less (PM2.5) was 22.75 µg/m3. Benzene values were higher than the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health limit. The PM2.5 values were unhealthy for sensitive groups according to the Air Quality Index. Moreover, BMI had a significant association with the amount of benzene produced intraoperatively (p=0.016). The findings also showed that the surgery duration had a significant association with toluene production (p=0.049).
Conclusion: The concentration of BTEX compounds was low, but the PM2.5 values are high in the studied operating rooms. Long-term exposure to BTEX compounds can be considered as a health risk for operating room personnel.
Full-Text [PDF 463 kb]   (243 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (114 Views)  
Article Type: Research | Subject: Medicine
Received: 2022/06/23 | Accepted: 2022/08/13 | Published: 2022/09/12

1. Carbajo-Rodríguez H, Aguayo-Albasini JL, Soria-Aledo V, García-López C. Surgical smoke: risks and preventive measures. Cirugía Española (English Edition). 2009;85(5):274-9. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
2. Zhao C, Kim MK, Kim HJ, Lee SK, Chung YJ, Park JK. Comparative safety analysis of surgical smoke from transurethral resection of the bladder tumors and transurethral resection of the prostate. Urology. 2013;82(3):744. e9-. e14. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
3. Spruce L. Back to Basics: Protection From Surgical Smoke: 1.2 www. aornjournal. org/content/cme. Aorn Journal. 2018;108(1):24-32. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
4. Edwards BE, Reiman RE. Results of a survey on current surgical smoke control practices. AORN journal. 2008;87(4):739-49. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
5. Ragde SF, Jørgensen RB, Føreland S. Characterisation of exposure to ultrafine particles from surgical smoke by use of a fast mobility particle sizer. Annals of Occupational Hygiene. 2016;60(7):860-74. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
6. González-Bayón L, González-Moreno S, Ortega-Pérez G. Safety considerations for operating room personnel during hyperthermic intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy perfusion. European Journal of Surgical Oncology (EJSO). 2006;32(6):619-24. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
7. Hill D, O'Neill J, Powell R, Oliver D. Surgical smoke-a health hazard in the operating theatre: a study to quantify exposure and a survey of the use of smoke extractor systems in UK plastic surgery units. Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery. 2012;65(7):911-6. [DOI] [PMID]
8. Ball KJAj. Surgical smoke evacuation guidelines: compliance among perioperative nurses. 2010;92(2):e1-e23. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
9. Barnes RLJTc. Regulating the disposal of cigarette butts as toxic hazardous waste. 2011;20(Suppl 1):i45-i8. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID] [Google Scholar]
10. Lee T, Soo J-C, LeBouf RF, Burns D, Schwegler-Berry D, Kashon M, et al. Surgical smoke control with local exhaust ventilation: Experimental study. Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene. 2018;15(4):341-50. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID] [Google Scholar]
11. Rey JM, Schramm D, Hahnloser D, Marinov D, Sigrist M. Spectroscopic investigation of volatile compounds produced during thermal and radiofrequency bipolar cautery on porcine liver. Measurement Science and Technology. 2008;19(7):075602. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
12. Choi SH, Choi DH, Kang DH, Ha Y-S, Lee JN, Kim BS, et al. Activated carbon fiber filters could reduce the risk of surgical smoke exposure during laparoscopic surgery: application of volatile organic compounds. Surgical endoscopy. 2018;32(10):4290-8. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
13. Wang H-K, Mo F, Ma C-G, Dai B, Shi G-H, Zhu Y, et al. Evaluation of fine particles in surgical smoke from an urologist's operating room by time and by distance. 2015;47(10):1671-8. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
14. Hosseini MS, Safari Variani A, Mehdipoor H, Hosseini MJJoID. Design, construction, and evaluation of portable local exhaust ventilation system to control electrosurgery smokes. 2012;16(1):72-9. [View at Publisher] [Google Scholar]
15. Lindsey C, Hutchinson M, Mellor GJAj. The nature and hazards of diathermy plumes: a review. 2015;101(4):428-42. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
16. Pennock JJAj. Surgical smoke: articulating the problem. 2020;111(1):P16-P7. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
17. Reed W, Zheng Y, Yekich M, Ross G, Salem AJIjocs, technology. Laboratory testing of a shuttle car canopy air curtain for respirable coal mine dust control. 2018;5(3):305-14. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID] [Google Scholar]
18. Eller PM, Cassinelli ME. NIOSH manual of analytical methods: Diane Publishing; 1994. [View at Publisher] [Google Scholar]
19. Choi SH, Kwon TG, Chung SK, Kim T-HJSe. Surgical smoke may be a biohazard to surgeons performing laparoscopic surgery. 2014;28(8):2374-80. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
20. Fitzgerald JEF, Malik M, Ahmed IJSe. A single-blind controlled study of electrocautery and ultrasonic scalpel smoke plumes in laparoscopic surgery. 2012;26(2):337-42. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
21. Brook RD, Rajagopalan SJC. "Stressed" about air pollution: time for personal action. Am Heart Assoc; 2017. p. 628-31. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID] [Google Scholar]
22. Peters A, Liu E, Verrier RL, Schwartz J, Gold DR, Mittleman M, et al. Air pollution and incidence of cardiac arrhythmia. 2000;11(1):11-7. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
23. Suwa T, Hogg JC, Quinlan KB, Ohgami A, Vincent R, van Eeden SFJJotACoC. Particulate air pollution induces progression of atherosclerosis. 2002;39(6):935-42. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
24. Ribes A, Carrera G, Gallego E, Roca X, Berenguer MJ, Guardino XJJoCA. Development and validation of a method for air-quality and nuisance odors monitoring of volatile organic compounds using multi-sorbent adsorption and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry thermal desorption system. 2007;1140(1-2):44-55. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
25. Zhou Y, Zhang S, Li Z, Zhu J, Bi Y, Bai Y, et al. Maternal benzene exposure during pregnancy and risk of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a meta-analysis of epidemiologic studies. 2014;9(10):e110466. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID] [Google Scholar]
26. Lin Y-W, Fan S-Z, Chang K-H, Huang C-S, Tang C-SJJotFMA. A novel inspection protocol to detect volatile compounds in breast surgery electrocautery smoke. 2010;109(7):511-6. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
27. Organization WHOJGWH. Global database on body mass index: BMI classification [Internet]. 2013.
28. Park H, de Virgilio C, Kim D, Shover A, Moazzez AJH. Effects of smoking and different BMI cutoff points on surgical site infection after elective open ventral hernia repair. 2021;25(2):337-43. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
29. Kameyama H, Otani T, Yamazaki T, Iwaya A, Uehara H, Harada R, et al. Comparison of surgical smoke between open surgery and laparoscopic surgery for colorectal disease in the COVID-19 era. 2021:1-8. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID] [Google Scholar]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:

Send email to the article author

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2023 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Clinical and Basic Research

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).