1- Health Technology Incubator, Deputy of Research and Technology, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran
2- Health Technology Incubator, Deputy of Research and Technology, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran ,Alireza.tmn@gmail.com
2- Health Technology Incubator, Deputy of Research and Technology, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran ,
Abstract: (108 Views)
Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly recognized as a transformative technology in healthcare innovation and digital health ecosystems. Health technology incubators play a key role in supporting startups and translating innovations into clinical and commercial solutions, yet the integration of AI within these ecosystems remains underexplored.
Methods: A narrative review was conducted to examine the role of AI in health technology incubators. Relevant literature was identified through searches of major scientific databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. The selected literature was screened for relevance and synthesized thematically.
Results: The findings indicate that AI can enhance health technology incubators through applications in business model innovation, health product development, clinical data analysis, policy-related decision-making, startup selection, and performance evaluation. Successful implementation requires adequate data resources, technological infrastructure, and a skilled workforce. Key challenges include ethical, legal, and governance issues, particularly those related to privacy, transparency, and accountability.
Conclusion: AI has the potential to improve the efficiency, effectiveness, and sustainability of health technology incubators by accelerating innovation and strengthening startup development. However, its successful adoption depends on robust infrastructure, governance frameworks, and further empirical validation in real-world settings.
Methods: A narrative review was conducted to examine the role of AI in health technology incubators. Relevant literature was identified through searches of major scientific databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. The selected literature was screened for relevance and synthesized thematically.
Results: The findings indicate that AI can enhance health technology incubators through applications in business model innovation, health product development, clinical data analysis, policy-related decision-making, startup selection, and performance evaluation. Successful implementation requires adequate data resources, technological infrastructure, and a skilled workforce. Key challenges include ethical, legal, and governance issues, particularly those related to privacy, transparency, and accountability.
Conclusion: AI has the potential to improve the efficiency, effectiveness, and sustainability of health technology incubators by accelerating innovation and strengthening startup development. However, its successful adoption depends on robust infrastructure, governance frameworks, and further empirical validation in real-world settings.
Keywords: Artificial Intelligence, Inventions, Digital Health, Narration, Health Technology Incubators
References
1. Thom N. Grundlagen des betrieblichen Innovationsmanagements. Königstein, Germany: Peter Hanstein Verlag; 1980. [View at Publisher] [Google Scholar]
2. Disselkamp M. Innovationen und Veränderungen. Stuttgart, Germany: Verlag W. Kohlhammer; 2017. [View at Publisher] [DOI]
3. Wheatley MC. Adapting Health Systems for an Aging World: Policy Innovations and Global Strategies. Premier Journal of Public Health. 2024;1:100010. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
4. Cefis E, Marsili O. A matter of life and death: Innovation and firm survival. Industrial and Corporate Change. 2005;14(6):1167-92. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
5. Sedita SR, Apa R, Bassetti T, Grandinetti R. Incubation matters: Measuring the effect of business incubators on the innovation performance of start‐ups. R&D Manag. 2019;49(4):439-54. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
6. Colombo MG, Delmastro M. How effective are technology incubators? Evidence from Italy. Research Policy. 2002;31(7):1103-22. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
7. Phillips RG. Technology business incubators: how effective as technology transfer mechanisms? Technology in Society. 2002;24(3):299-316. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
8. Okenema EF. Exploring The Impact Of AI Integration In Business Incubators And Accelerators On Entrepreneurship Education And Startup Success. Journal of Emerging Trends in Educational Research and Policy Studies (JETERAPS). 2024;15(5):185-90. [View at Publisher] [Google Scholar]
9. Jiang F, Jiang Y, Zhi H, Dong Y, Li H, Ma S, et al. Artificial intelligence in healthcare: past, present and future. Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2017;2(4):230-43. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
10. Katehakis DG, Filippidis D, Karamanis K, Kouroubali A, Farmaki A, Natsiavas P, et al. The smartHEALTH European Digital Innovation Hub experiences and challenges for accelerating the transformation of public and private organizations within the innovation ecosystem. Front Med (Lausanne). 2024:11:1503235. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
11. Sohail K, Belitski M, Castro Christiansen L. Developing business incubation process frameworks: A systematic literature review. J Bus Res. 2023;162:113902. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
12. Bone J, Gonzalez-Uribe J, Haley C, Lahr H. The Impact of Business Accelerators and Incubators in the UK. London: Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy (BEIS); 2019. [View at Publisher] [Google Scholar]
13. OECD. Technology Incubators: Nurturing Small Firms. Paris; 1997. [View at Publisher]
14. Sinha R. The role and impact of new technologies on healthcare systems. Discov Health Syst. 2024;3(1):96. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
15. Hobbs KG, Link AN, Scott JT. Science and technology parks: an annotated and analytical literature review. J Technol Transf. 2017;42(4):957-76. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
16. McCarthy J, Minsky M, Rochester N, Shannon CE, Abrahams PW, Bobrow DG, et al. Artificial intelligence. Cambridge (MA): Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Research Laboratory of Electronics; 1959. [View at Publisher]
17. Gama F, Magistretti S. Artificial intelligence in innovation management: A review of innovation capabilities and a taxonomy of AI applications. Journal of Product Innovation Management. 2023;42(1):76-111. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
18. Sjödin D, Parida V, Palmié M, Wincent J. How AI capabilities enable business model innovation: Scaling AI through co-evolutionary processes and feedback loops. J Bus Res. 2021;134:574-87. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
19. Lee J, Suh T, Roy D, Baucus M. Emerging technology and business model innovation: The case of artificial intelligence. Journal of Open Innovation. 2019;5(3). [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
20. Vocke C, Constantinescu C, Popescu D. Application potentials of artificial intelligence for the design of innovation processes. Procedia CIRP. 2019;84:810-3. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
21. Soni N, Sharma EK, Singh N, Kapoor A. Artificial Intelligence in Business: From Research and Innovation to Market Deployment. Procedia Computer Science. 2020;167:2200-10. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
22. PWC. Thriving in an age of continuous reinvention: 27th Annual Global CEO Survey. London: PricewaterhouseCoopers; 2024. Available from: https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/ceo-survey.htm. [View at Publisher] [Google Scholar]
23. Kulkov I. Next-generation business models for artificial intelligence startups in the healthcare industry. IJEBR. 2023;29(4):860-85. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
24. Jorzik P, Klein SP, Kanbach DK, Kraus S. AI-driven business model innovation: A systematic review and research agenda. J Bus Res. 2024;182:114764. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
25. Hong MK, Hakimi S, Chen Y-Y, Toyoda H, Wu C, Klenk M. Generative AI for Product Design: Getting the Right Design and the Design Right. 2023. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
26. Tursunbayeva A, Renkema M. Artificial Intelligence in Health-Care: Implications for the Job Design of Healthcare Professionals. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources. 2023;61(4):845-87. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
27. Agency EM. Qualification opinion for artificial intelligence-based measurement of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis histology in liver biopsies to determine disease activity in NASH/MASH clinical trials. 2025. [View at Publisher]
28. Melchane S, Elmir Y, Kacimi F, Boubchir L. Artificial intelligence for infectious disease prediction and prevention: A comprehensive review. 2024. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
29. Organization WH. Harnessing artificial intelligence for health. 2024. [View at Publisher]
30. Ramezani M, Takian A, Bakhtiari A, Rabiee HA, Ghazanfari S, Mostafavi H. The application of artificial intelligence in health policy: a scoping review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023;23:1416. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
31. Ross G, Das S, Sciro D, Raza H. CapitalVX: A machine learning model for startup selection and exit prediction. JFDS. 2021;7(4):94-114. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
32. Razaghzadeh Bidgoli M, Raeesi Vanani I, Goodarzi M. Predicting the success of startups using a machine learning approach. J Innov Entrep. 2024;13.80. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
33. Kleinert S, Urbig D. Startup Evaluations with Generative Artificial Intelligence: An Exploratory Study on Early-Stage Investments and Survival Predictions by Large Language Models. Entrep Theory Pract. 2026:10422587261430320. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
34. Pareek A, Lungren MP, Halabi SS. The requirements for performing artificial-intelligence-related research and model development.Pediatr Radiol. 2022;52(11):2094-100. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
35. Ahsan SMM, Hoque T, Hasan MS, Chowdhury M, Dhungel A. Hardware Accelerators for Artificial Intelligence. In: Iranmanesh A, Sayadi H, editors. AI-Enabled Electronic Circuit and System Design: From Ideation to Utilization. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland; 2025. p. 497-535. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
36. Raschka S, Patterson J, Nolet C. Machine Learning in Python: Main Developments and Technology Trends in Data Science, Machine Learning, and Artificial Intelligence. Information. 2020;11(4):193. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
37. Rajagopal A, Ayanian S, Ryu AJ, Qian R, Legler SR, Peeler EA, et al. Machine Learning Operations in Health Care: A Scoping Review. Mayo Clin Proc Digit Health. 2024;2(3):421-37. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
38. Huang S-C, Pareek A, Seyyedi S, Banerjee I, Lungren MP . Fusion of medical imaging and electronic health records using deep learning: a systematic review and implementation guidelines. NPJ Digit Med. 2020;3:136. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
39. Krones F, Marikkar U, Parsons G, Szmul A, Mahdi A, Conduah AK. Review of multimodal machine learning approaches in healthcare.Inf Fusion. 2025:114:None. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
40. Conduah AK, Ofoe S, Siaw-Marfo D. Data privacy in healthcare: Global challenges and solutions. Digital Health. 2025;11:20552076251343959. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
41. Harvard Medical School. Leading AI Innovation in Health Care [Internet]. Boston (MA): Harvard Medical School; 2026 [cited 2026 Jul 20]. Available from: https://learn.hms.harvard.edu/programs/leading-ai-innovation-health-care. [View at Publisher]
42. Rincon J, Pelletier AR, Gilliland D, Wang W, Wang D, Sankar BS, et al. Bridge2AI: Building A Cross-disciplinary Curriculum Towards AI-Enhanced Biomedical and Clinical Care. ArXiv Preprint. 2025. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
43. Organization WH. Health data privacy policy brief. Geneva; 2024. [View at Publisher]
44. Wang F, Casalino LP, Khullar D. Deep learning in medicine: promise, progress, and challenges. JAMA Intern Med. 2019;179(3):293-4. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
45. Fritzsche M-C, Akyüz K, Cano Abadía M, McLennan S, Marttinen P, Mayrhofer MT. Ethical layering in AI-driven polygenic risk scores: New complexities, new challenges. Front Genet. 2023;14:1098439. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
46. van Leersum CM, Maathuis C. Human centred explainable AI decision-making in healthcare. J Responsib Technol. 2025;21:100108. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
47. Ehsan U, Wintersberger P, Liao QV, Watkins EA, Manger C, Daumé Iii H, et al. Human-Centered Explainable AI (HCXAI): Beyond opening the black-box of AI. In:Extended Abstracts of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: Association for Computing Machinery; 2022. p. 1-7. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
48. Kim HS, Kim DJ, Yoon KH. Medical big data is not yet available: why we need realism rather than exaggeration.Endocrinol Metab (Seoul).
2019;34(4):349-54. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
49. Naddaf M. ChatGPT generates fake data set to support scientific hypothesis. Nature. 2023;623(7989):895-6. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
50. Gazquez-Garcia J, Sanchez-Bocanegra CL, Sevillano JL. AI in the Health Sector: Systematic Review of Key Skills for Future Health Professionals. JMIR Med Educ. 2025;11:e58161. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
