دوره 7، شماره 1 - ( 4-1402 )
جلد 7 شماره 1 صفحات 5-1 |
برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها
Ethics code: IR.GOUMS.REC.1399.230
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Modanloo M, Halakou S, Khoddam H, Nikpeyma N, A. Maddaha S, Asgari F. The anxiety of patients under regional anesthesia: operating room healthcare providers’ point of view. jcbr 2023; 7 (1) :1-5
URL: http://jcbr.goums.ac.ir/article-1-387-fa.html
URL: http://jcbr.goums.ac.ir/article-1-387-fa.html
مدانلو مهناز، هلاکو سولماز، خدام حمیرا، نیک پیما نسرین، علینقی مداح سیده ماهرخ، عسگری فاطمه. The anxiety of patients under regional anesthesia: operating room healthcare providers’ point of view. Journal of Clinical and Basic Research. 1402; 7 (1) :1-5
مهناز مدانلو1 
، سولماز هلاکو* 2، حمیرا خدام1 ، نسرین نیک پیما3 ، سیده ماهرخ علینقی مداح4 ، فاطمه عسگری5
، سولماز هلاکو* 2، حمیرا خدام1 ، نسرین نیک پیما3 ، سیده ماهرخ علینقی مداح4 ، فاطمه عسگری5
1- دکترای پرستاری- دانشیار دانشگاه علوم پزشکی گلستان
2- دکترای پرستاری- دانشکده پیراپزشکی- دانشگاه علوم پزشکی گلستان ، solmazhalakou@gmail.com
3- دکترای پرستاری- دانشیار دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تهران
4- استادیار- دانشکده پزشکی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی گلستان
5- کارشناس بیهوشی
2- دکترای پرستاری- دانشکده پیراپزشکی- دانشگاه علوم پزشکی گلستان ، solmazhalakou@gmail.com
3- دکترای پرستاری- دانشیار دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تهران
4- استادیار- دانشکده پزشکی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی گلستان
5- کارشناس بیهوشی
چکیده: (898 مشاهده)
Background: Preoperative anxiety is a widespread phenomenon in anesthesia, a challenging issue for the caring team in evaluating and managing patients’ anxiety. This study aimed to determine the operating room (OR) healthcare providers’ point of view on the patients’ anxiety under regional anesthesia.
Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 203 OR healthcare providers in the adult public educational hospitals of Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran, from April to November 2021. Eligible OR healthcare providers, including nurse anesthetists (104), surgical technologists (82), and anesthesiologists (17), were recruited through the census method. Data were collected using anesthesiologists’ perception of patients’ anxiety under a regional anesthesia questionnaire developed by Jlala (2010). The impact score was determined to ensure the face validity of the Iranian version of the questionnaire, and ten healthcare providers checked it qualitatively. The average score of the content validity index (CVI=0.978) and content validity ratio (CVR=0.978) were acceptable. The instrument’s internal consistency was evaluated using Cronbach’s alpha coefficient (α =0.675). Data were analyzed in SPSS software version 18 using Fisher’s Exact, Chi-Square, and Kruskal-Wallis tests.
Results: There were no differences in most questionnaire items between healthcare providers’ views based on their professional roles (P<0.05). More than half of the patients who were candidates for spinal anesthesia were anxious (57.1%). Incorrect information from non-experts, family, friends, and the media often increased patients’ anxiety (59.3%). The most commonly used method for managing patients’ anxiety is sedation using medication (40.9%) and relaxation techniques (35.5%).
Conclusions: Healthcare providers considered that anxiety of patients who were candidates for regional anesthesia was a prevalent problem that can be affected by various factors. All necessary facilities should be considered to create and maintain patients’ comfort in the OR.
Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 203 OR healthcare providers in the adult public educational hospitals of Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran, from April to November 2021. Eligible OR healthcare providers, including nurse anesthetists (104), surgical technologists (82), and anesthesiologists (17), were recruited through the census method. Data were collected using anesthesiologists’ perception of patients’ anxiety under a regional anesthesia questionnaire developed by Jlala (2010). The impact score was determined to ensure the face validity of the Iranian version of the questionnaire, and ten healthcare providers checked it qualitatively. The average score of the content validity index (CVI=0.978) and content validity ratio (CVR=0.978) were acceptable. The instrument’s internal consistency was evaluated using Cronbach’s alpha coefficient (α =0.675). Data were analyzed in SPSS software version 18 using Fisher’s Exact, Chi-Square, and Kruskal-Wallis tests.
Results: There were no differences in most questionnaire items between healthcare providers’ views based on their professional roles (P<0.05). More than half of the patients who were candidates for spinal anesthesia were anxious (57.1%). Incorrect information from non-experts, family, friends, and the media often increased patients’ anxiety (59.3%). The most commonly used method for managing patients’ anxiety is sedation using medication (40.9%) and relaxation techniques (35.5%).
Conclusions: Healthcare providers considered that anxiety of patients who were candidates for regional anesthesia was a prevalent problem that can be affected by various factors. All necessary facilities should be considered to create and maintain patients’ comfort in the OR.
نوع مقاله: پژوهشي |
ارسال پیام به نویسنده مسئول
| بازنشر اطلاعات | |
 |
این مقاله تحت شرایط Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License قابل بازنشر است. |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).