Volume 2, Issue 3 (Journal of Clinical and Basic Research(JCBR) 2018)
jcbr 2018, 2(3): 1-9 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Mohammadi M, Mirkarimi M, Tahmasebi Limooni S. Familiarity with the Open Access Movement among Faculty Members of Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Iran. jcbr 2018; 2 (3) :1-9
URL: http://jcbr.goums.ac.ir/article-1-151-en.html
URL: http://jcbr.goums.ac.ir/article-1-151-en.html
1- Golestan Research Center of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran
2- Library and Information Sciences, Deputy of Research and Technology, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran
3- Department of Library and Information Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Babol branch, Babol, Iran
2- Library and Information Sciences, Deputy of Research and Technology, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran
3- Department of Library and Information Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Babol branch, Babol, Iran
Abstract: (4211 Views)
Background and objectives: Free (open) access to scientific information has emerged as a new paradigm to resolve existing problems and to improve the scientific communication process. This study was conducted to evaluate the level of familiarity with the open access movement among faculty members of Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Iran.
methods: A pre-made questionnaire was utilized in this analytical survey. Cronbach's α of 0.75 verified the reliability of the questionnaire. The study included 157 faculty members employed via non-probability randomized sampling and the Cochran's sample size formula. Descriptive statistics, Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, Tukey’s test and Pearson correlation were used to analyze the data.
Results: Faculty members had little acquaintance with the open access to scientific information. The greatest level of familiarity was with ‘‘open access journals’’ (mean score: 2.42), while the lowest level of familiarity was with ‘‘the open access movement’’ (mean score: 3.07).
Conclusions: The faculty members of the Golestan University of Medical Sciences have relatively moderate level of familiarity (compared to other universities in the country) with the open access movement, but it is still far from ideal. Given the importance of free access to scientific information and its positive impact on the visibility and credibility of scientific products, it is essential to plan and take action to raise awareness and promote implementation of this movement among faculty members.
methods: A pre-made questionnaire was utilized in this analytical survey. Cronbach's α of 0.75 verified the reliability of the questionnaire. The study included 157 faculty members employed via non-probability randomized sampling and the Cochran's sample size formula. Descriptive statistics, Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, Tukey’s test and Pearson correlation were used to analyze the data.
Results: Faculty members had little acquaintance with the open access to scientific information. The greatest level of familiarity was with ‘‘open access journals’’ (mean score: 2.42), while the lowest level of familiarity was with ‘‘the open access movement’’ (mean score: 3.07).
Conclusions: The faculty members of the Golestan University of Medical Sciences have relatively moderate level of familiarity (compared to other universities in the country) with the open access movement, but it is still far from ideal. Given the importance of free access to scientific information and its positive impact on the visibility and credibility of scientific products, it is essential to plan and take action to raise awareness and promote implementation of this movement among faculty members.
References
1. Hasanzadeh MH, Hochghan F. The study of barriers to open access to Iranian journals from the viewpoint of publishers. Library and Information Sciences. 2009;13(1):35-52.
2. Lwoga ET, Questier F. Open access behaviours and perceptions of health sciences faculty and roles of information professionals. Health Information & Libraries Journal. 2015;32(1):37-49. [DOI:10.1111/hir.12094]
3. Serrano-Vicente R, Melero R, Abadal E. Open Access Awareness and Perceptions in an Institutional Landscape. The Journal of Academic Librarianship. 2016;42(5):595-603. [DOI:10.1016/j.acalib.2016.07.002]
4. Tonta Y, Ünal Y, Al U. The research impact of open access journal articles. International Conference on Electronic Publishing; Vienna 2007.
5. Abdekhoda M, Alibeyk M, Hossini F, Ravand S, Mohammadi M. Tehran University of Medical Science Faculties' Member's Attitude Toward Open Access to Scientific Article: a Survey Study. Health Inf Manage. 2013;11(7):937-44.
6. Zavareghi R. Studying the Attitudes of Graduate Students of Tabriz University to the Concept of Open Access to Scientific Articles. Library and Information Sciences. 2009;12(3):209-32.
7. Ojagh F, Kousha K. Study of the Pattern of Self-Archiving of Iranian Writers: Comparison between the Fields of Science and Social Sciences. Research on Information Science and Public Libraries. 2011;17(2):285-304.
8. Ghazi mirsaeed J, Yousefianzadeh O, Maleki F, Moradi-Joo M, Chashmyazdan M. The Use of Open Access Resources by Post-graduate Students in School of Allied Health of Tehran University of Medical Science In 2015. Journal of Health Administration. 2016;19(66):81-90.
9. Fahimnia F, Montazeri F. Effective Triggers and Barriers of Self-archiving Behavior Displayed by Knowledge and Information Sciences' Faculty Members in Iran. Human Information Interaction. 2014;1(2):118-25.
10. Abdekhoda M, Alibeyk M, Hossini AF, Ravand S, Mohammadi M, Zarie J. A Survey Study To Identify Tehran University Of Medical Science Faculties' Member's Familiarities With Open Access Movement And Their Attitude About It. Payavard Salamat. 2014;7(5):457-67.
11. Ghane M. A Survey of Open Access Barriers to Scientific Information: Providing an Appropriate Pattern for Scientific Communication in Iran. Grey Journal (TGJ). 2006;2(1).
12. Sotudeh H, Changiz N, Hashemnia S. The approach of Iranian scholars to publish in valid free journals and refer to them. Health Inf Manage. 2010;13(7):34-6.
13. Davis PM, Lewenstein BV, Simon DH, Booth JG, Connolly MJL. Open access publishing, article downloads, and citations: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2008;337. [DOI:10.1136/bmj.a568]
14. Singson M, Joy MG, Thiyagarajan S, Dkhar V. Perceptions of Open Access Publishing by Faculty at Pondicherry University: A Survey. International Information & Library Review. 2015;47(1-2):1-10. [DOI:10.1080/10572317.2015.1021625]
15. Khalili L. Barriers to Publish in Open Access Journals According To Medical Researchers. Health Inf Manage. 2015;12(4):435-44.
16. Rodriguez JE. Awareness and Attitudes about Open Access Publishing: A Glance at Generational Differences. The Journal of Academic Librarianship. 2014;40(6):604-10. [DOI:10.1016/j.acalib.2014.07.013]
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).