[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
:: Volume 2, Issue 2 (Journal of Clinical and Basic Research(JCBR) 2018) ::
jcbr 2018, 2(2): 24-28 Back to browse issues page
Evaluating the Structure of Prenatal Care Using the Donabedian Model: A Study at Health Centers in Gorgan, Iran
Parvin Vizvari , Fatemeh Dabbaghi , Ghareman Mamoodi , Akram Sanagoo
Abstract:   (10 Views)
Introduction: Healthcare centers aim to improve the quality of managed care using a diverse range of organizational strategies and through management of patients’ health and behavior. The goal of prenatal care is to ensure the health of future mothers during the prenatal and postnatal periods. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the structure of prenatal care in health centers of Gorgan (Iran) based on the Donabedian model. Materials and methods: This descriptive-analytical study was carried out in 18 of 22 health centers in Gorgan (Iran) that were selected via multistage probability sampling. Data were collected using a 60-item questionnaire based on the Donabedian model with 5 dimensions (physical infrastructure, waiting room equipment, midwifery unit equipment, human resource infrastructure and access to services). Another questionnaire consisting of 14 questions was used to collect biographic information. Data were analyzed with SPSS (version 16). Normal distribution of variables was assessed using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Parametric tests (binomial) and nonparametric coefficient were used for assessment of normal and non-normal data, respectively. All statistical analyses were performed at 95% confidence level (P <0.05). The Friedman test was used for one-way repeated measures analysis of variance by ranks. Results: The average total score of structure was 30.83 in the health centers. The average score for waiting room equipment, midwifery unit equipment, human resource infrastructure, physical infrastructure and access to services was 4.61, 13.94, 1.78, 6.56 and 3.94, respectively. Based on the average structure scores and prioritization, the rankings were as follows: physical infrastructure, midwifery unit equipment, waiting room equipment, access to services and human resource infrastructure. Conclusions: Generally, the low score of quality of services in the present study indicates the need for planning and paying proper attention to non-therapeutic aspects of health services and improvement of services quality.
Keywords: Managed care, Pregnancy, Structure, Donabedian model
Full-Text [PDF 252 kb]   (13 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Statistics and epidemiology
Received: 2018/09/13 | Accepted: 2018/09/13 | Published: 2018/09/13
References
1. Jena Abadi H AK, Nastizai N,Yaghoobi N. The gap between perceptions and expectations of patients about quality of services in Zahedan health centers using the SERVQUAL model. Payesh Journal. 2011;10(4):449-57.
2. Tabrizi JS, Gholipour K, Alipour R, Farahbakhsh M, Asghari-Jafarabadi M, Haghaei M. Service Quality of maternity care from the perspective of pregnant women in Tabriz Health Centers and Health Posts – 2010-2011. Hospital. 2014;12(4):9-18.
3. Muntlin Å, Gunningberg L, Carlsson M. Patients' perceptions of quality of care at an emergency department and identification of areas for quality improvement. Journal of clinical nursing. 2006;15(8):1045-56. [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01368.x]
4. Cheng Lim P, Tang NK. A study of patients' expectations and satisfaction in Singapore hospitals. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance. 2000;13(7):290-9 [DOI:10.1108/09526860010378735]
5. Ghaffari Darabi M YM, Khorasani E,Alaghemandan H. The Role of Value Chain for Improving Health Care Quality. Health Inf Manage. 2015;11(6):811[Persian]
6. Jahani shorab N, Ghafari sardasht F , et al. Review process based on pre-pregnancy care Dvnabdyn pattern in health centers in Mashhad. IJOGI. June 2013; 53(16): 7-17.
7. World Health Organization. Meeting to develop a global consensus on preconception care to reduce maternal and childhood mortality and morbidity: World Health Organization Headquarters, Geneva, 6–7 February 2012: meeting report.
8. Nicolaides KH. Turning the pyramid of prenatal care. Fetal diagnosis and therapy. 2011;29(3):183-96. [DOI:10.1159/000324320]
9. Hakari D MR, Velayati A,Zarei S. Evaluation of quality of pregnancy care in a number of Tabriz health centers. Woman and family studies. 2012;5(8):157-78.[persian]
10. Oladapo OT,Christiana A, Sule-Odu AO. Quality of antenatal services at the primary care level in southwest Nigeria. A J of reproductive Health. 2008;12(3):71-92.
11. Simbar M, Nahidi F, Akbarzadeh A. Quality of Antenatal Care in Health Centres related to Medical Science University of Shahid beheshti. Ira J Payesh. 2010; 11(4): 529-44.[persian]
12. Ghaffari Sardasht F, Jafarnejad F, Jahani N. Applying Donabedian Quality-of-care Framework in Assessing the Structure of Preconception Care in Urban Health Centers. Mashhad 2012. J Mazandaran Univ Med Sci. 2014; 24(116):149-160.[persian]
13. .Rani M, Bonu S, Harvey S. Differentials in the quality of antenatal care in India. Int J of Quality Health care. 2008; 20(1): 62-71. [DOI:10.1093/intqhc/mzm052]
14. .Agha S, Do M. The quality of family planning services and client satisfaction in the public and private sectors in Kenya. Iint J of Quality in Health care. 2009; 21(2): 87-96. [DOI:10.1093/intqhc/mzp002]
15. Naariyong S, Poudel KC, Rahman M, Yasuoka J, Otsuka K, Jimba M. Quality of antenatal care services in the Birim North District of Ghana: contribution of the community-based health planning and services program. Maternal and child health journal. 2012;16(8):1709-17. [DOI:10.1007/s10995-011-0880-z]
16. .Kyei NNA, Cholin C, Gabrysch S. Quality of antenatal care in Zambia: a national assessment. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2012; 12: 151-162. [DOI:10.1186/1471-2393-12-151]
Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA code


XML     Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Vizvari P, Dabbaghi F, Mamoodi G, Sanagoo A. Evaluating the Structure of Prenatal Care Using the Donabedian Model: A Study at Health Centers in Gorgan, Iran. jcbr. 2018; 2 (2) :24-28
URL: http://jcbr.goums.ac.ir/article-1-143-en.html


Volume 2, Issue 2 (Journal of Clinical and Basic Research(JCBR) 2018) Back to browse issues page
Journal of Clinical and Basic Research Journal of Clinical and Basic Research
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 31 queries by YEKTAWEB 3755