Volume 2, Issue 1 ((Journal of Clinical and Basic Research(JCBR) 2018)
jcbr 2018, 2(1): 39-47 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Sudhir M S, Raj P. Preoperative Grading System versus Intraoperative Grading System as Predictors for Difficult Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Comparative Validation Study. jcbr 2018; 2 (1) :39-47
URL: http://jcbr.goums.ac.ir/article-1-121-en.html
URL: http://jcbr.goums.ac.ir/article-1-121-en.html
1- Department of General Surgery, Kempegowda Institute of Medical Sciences,
2- Rajiv GandhiUniversity of Health Sciences, Karnataka, India
2- Rajiv GandhiUniversity of Health Sciences, Karnataka, India
Abstract: (4516 Views)
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Gallbladder-related disease is currently one of the most commonindications for elective and emergency surgical management of cholecystitis. Considering the increasing rate of complications, there has been a notable paradigm shift in the management of patients since the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.We aimed to develop a new preoperativescoring model for evaluation of the laparoscopic cholecystectomy outcome. Materials and methods:All patients admitted to the Kempegowda Institute of Medical Sciences from January 2016 to August 2017 with symptoms of gallstone disease were screened for cholelithiasis. Hundred patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomlyselected. Before the surgery patients were scored according the preoperative model, and the intraoperative scoring was recorded during the surgery.Finally, the two scoring systems were compared. Results:Preoperative scoring had a sensitivity of 95.71%, specificity of 50%, positive predictive value of 81.71%, negative predictive value of 83.3%, diagnostic accuracy of 82%, and Kappa agreement of 0.5161 compared to the intraoperative scoring system. Conclusions:We strongly recommend to use the preoperativescoring system for predicting the degree ofdifficulty for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. In addition, it is also recommended to conduct more studies on the application of the intraoperative scoring system.
Introduction: Gallbladder-related disease is currently one of the most commonindications for elective and emergency surgical management of cholecystitis. Considering the increasing rate of complications, there has been a notable paradigm shift in the management of patients since the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.We aimed to develop a new preoperativescoring model for evaluation of the laparoscopic cholecystectomy outcome. Materials and methods:All patients admitted to the Kempegowda Institute of Medical Sciences from January 2016 to August 2017 with symptoms of gallstone disease were screened for cholelithiasis. Hundred patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomlyselected. Before the surgery patients were scored according the preoperative model, and the intraoperative scoring was recorded during the surgery.Finally, the two scoring systems were compared. Results:Preoperative scoring had a sensitivity of 95.71%, specificity of 50%, positive predictive value of 81.71%, negative predictive value of 83.3%, diagnostic accuracy of 82%, and Kappa agreement of 0.5161 compared to the intraoperative scoring system. Conclusions:We strongly recommend to use the preoperativescoring system for predicting the degree ofdifficulty for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. In addition, it is also recommended to conduct more studies on the application of the intraoperative scoring system.
Keywords: Gallbladder disease, Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, Grading system, Preoperative, Intraoperative
Article Type: Research |
References
1. Randhawa JS, Pujahari AK. Preoperative prediction of difficult lap chole: A scoring method. Indian Journal of Surgery. 2009; 71:198–201. [DOI:10.1007/s12262-009-0055-y]
2. Dhanke PS, Ugane SP. Factors predicting difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A single-institution experience. International Journal of Students' Research. 2014; 4(1):3-7. [DOI:10.4103/2230-7095.137612]
3. Sugrue M, Sahebally SM, Ansaloni L, Zielinski MD. Grading operative findings at laparoscopic cholecystectomy-a new scoring system. World Journal of Emergency Surgery. 2015 Dec;10(1):14. [DOI:10.1186/s13017-015-0005-x]
4. Nachnani J, Supe A. Pre-operative prediction of difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy using clinical and ultrasonographic parameters. Indian journal of gastroenterology. 2005; 24:16–8.
5. Singh K, Ohri A. Difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A large series from north India. Indian Journal of Surgery. 2006; 68(4):205–8.
6. Daradkeh SS, Suwan Z, Abu-Khalaf M. Preoperative ultrasonography and prediction of difficulties in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. World Journal of Surgery. 1998; 22(1):75-7. [DOI:10.1007/s002689900352]
7. Rosen M, Brody F, Ponsky J. Predictive factors for conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The American journal of surgery. 2002; 184(3):254-8. [DOI:10.1016/S0002-9610(02)00934-0]
8. Lal P, Agarwal PN, Malik VK, Chakravarti AL. A difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy that requires conversion to open procedure can be predicted by preoperative ultrasonography. Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. 2002; 6(1):59–63.
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).