Volume 8, Issue 3 (Journal of Clinical and Basic Research (JCBR) 2024)                   jcbr 2024, 8(3): 10-13 | Back to browse issues page


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Shahbazmohammadi H. Response surface optimization for lactose inducible expression of recombinant fructosyl peptide oxidase enzyme in Escherichia coli. jcbr 2024; 8 (3) :10-13
URL: http://jcbr.goums.ac.ir/article-1-454-en.html
Cellular and Molecular Research Center, Research Institute for Prevention of Non-Communicable Diseases, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran , sh_hamid_biochem@yahoo.com
Full-Text [PDF 625 kb]   (129 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (331 Views)
Full-Text:   (38 Views)
Introduction
Fructosyl peptide oxidase (FPOX) belongs to the oxidoreductase family and is responsible for catalyzing the oxidative deglycation process of fructosyl peptide into unglycated peptide, glucosone, and hydrogen peroxide (1,2). The FPOX enzyme, obtained from various microorganisms, has been utilized to enzymatically test glycated proteins such as hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and glycated albumin (3). HbA1c is a crucial test for detecting and controlling diabetes in patients (4). Several studies have been performed on optimizing the production and cost-effective bioprocessing of FPOX, a diagnostic enzyme with industrial significance (5,6). However, industrial uses of this biocatalyst require large quantities of the enzyme, along with efficient production and cost-effectiveness (7). The culture medium components and type of expression inducer are important factors influencing microbial growth and enzyme production cost (8).
Statistical designs such as Plackett-Burman design (PBD) and response surface methodology (RSM) are effective methods for optimizing experiment conditions and obtaining desired results (9,10). RSM involves a variety of statistical techniques to assess the relationship between the response of an experiment and a group of variables. Identifying effective factors, optimal levels, and potential interactions helps improve the accuracy of predicting optimal conditions (11,12). RSM has proven effective in improving the production of different recombinant enzymes, e.g., α-amylase (13), laccase (14), and L-glutaminase (15). In this communication, recombinant FPOX was produced in Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) with lactose-inducible expression, and production yield was optimized using statistical methods.

Methods
Expression of recombinant enzyme
The nucleotide sequence of Eupenicillium terrenum FPOX was synthesized and inserted into the pET-28a (+) expression vector through cloning. The recombinant plasmid pET28FPOX was expressed in E. coli BL21 (DE3) cells grown in Luria-Bertani (LB) medium with 100 μg/mL ampicillin at 37ºC and 200 rpm until reaching OD600 = 0.6–0.8. Induction was done with lactose or IPTG at 37°C and 250 rpm for 5 h. After induction, the bacteria were collected, rinsed with 0.9% NaCl solution, and frozen at −20 °C. The cells were then dissolved in lysis buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, 10 mM EDTA, 1% glycerol, pH 8.0), disrupted by sonication, and clarified through centrifugation at 9000 rpm for 30 min at 4 °C. The supernatant of the cell lysate was used for the subsequent experiments (16).
Optimization of FPOX expression by statistical designs
The optimization plan involved identifying the most important elements through PBD and then assessing the best concentrations using central composite design (CCD). The variables, including glycerol, tryptone, yeast extract, K2HPO4, MgSO4, induction time, temperature, and lactose, were examined at two levels (Table 1). The experiments were performed three times each, and the mean enzyme activity was determined. Student's t-test was used to calculate the p-value for each variable. The variables that had a significant impact based on the PBD test were studied using a three-level CCD with 44 runs. ANOVA was used to test the importance of variables. The significance of the model was supported using Fisher's statistical test (F-test) and the low p-value. Three-dimensional graphs were employed to assess the apparent connections among the important variables (14,16). The statistical designs were conducted using Design Expert 11.0 software from State-Ease, Inc. in the USA.

Table 1. Variables used for finding factors affecting FPOX expression
Enzyme expression analysis

Enzyme expression was analyzed using sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and an enzyme activity assay. The electrophoresis was conducted for 5 hours at 50 V and 15 mA. The gel was stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250 and subsequently destained through diffusion in a mixture containing 40% (v/v) methanol and 10% (v/v) acetic acid (17). The activity of FPOX was assessed using the HRP-linked reaction system. The components mixed in a 1 mL reaction mixture at 25°C included 0.1 M potassium phosphate buffer (pH 8.0), 3.0 mM substrate (Fru-ValHis), 0.45 mM 4-aminoantipyrine, 0.5 mM TOOS, 2.0 U/mL HRP, and enzyme solution. Quinoneimine dye formation was then assessed at 555 nm using spectrophotometry. One unit of FPOX activity is defined as the amount of enzyme that can oxidize 1 µmol of substrate per minute (16). Protein concentration was determined using the Bradford method, with bovine serum albumin as a reference standard.

Results
Optimization of FPOX expression
PBD was used to identify key variables with a significant impact on the production of the FPOX enzyme. Table 2 illustrates the statistical analysis of PBD for seven variables. Examination of p-values indicated that yeast extract, tryptone, K2HPO4, and lactose had significant impacts on FPOX production (p < 0.05) (Table 2). Therefore, yeast extract, tryptone, K2HPO4, and lactose were chosen to be further optimized through CCD. A total of 44 experiments were conducted to investigate how the combination of these variables affects FPOX expression. The variables and experimental outcomes are presented in Table 3. The R² coefficient of 0.9885 for FPOX production showed a good agreement between the experimental and predicted data. Table 4 contains statistical analysis of CCD. To examine how the test variables interacted, p-values were analyzed to determine the importance of each coefficient (Table 4). Model terms are considered significant if they have p-values below 0.05. The linear model showed that X₁, X₂, X₃, and X₄ were statistically significant terms according to the findings. ANOVA (Table 4) confirmed the appropriateness of the model. The F-value and the value of "Prob > F" were 4.36 and 0.0017, respectively, indicating that the model was statistically significant. The R² coefficient, expected R², and adjusted R² values were 0.9960, 0.9875, and 0.9733, respectively. The CV value of 1266.64 indicated a high level of reliability in the experiment. As illustrated in Figure 1, a linear pattern is observed, showing good consistency between the actual and predicted response values for enzyme activity and biomass concentration. In Figures 2A, 2D, and 2F, it can be observed that FPOX activity increases at moderate levels of yeast extract, tryptone, and lactose. On the other hand, the activity of FPOX rises as the concentrations of glycerol and K2HPO4 increase (Figures 2B and 2C).
Experimental validation
The calculated enzymatic activity of FPOX under optimal conditions was 28.77 U/mL. Table 5 illustrates the comparison between IPTG-inducible and lactose-inducible methods for FPOX expression. Testing the same induction strategy in shake flasks resulted in an FPOX activity of 28.77 U/mL, which was 18.56-fold greater than with the IPTG induction protocol. Figure 3 shows a higher level of FPOX activity in the lactose-induced protocol compared to the IPTG-induced method. Figure 4
depicts the SDS-PAGE gel analysis of recombinant FPOX produced using both IPTG and lactose induction techniques. The electrophoresis results display the presence of a protein weighing 50.0 kDa, suggesting that recombinant FPOX is expressed in response to lactose induction.
Table 2. Statistical analysis of experimental design for each variable affecting FPOX expression

Table 3. Experimental design results of FPOX activity and biomass concentration

Table 4. ANOVA of the CCD results affecting FPOX expression

Figure 1. Correlation between the actual and predicted values. (A) Modeling of enzyme activity of FPOX. (B) Modeling of biomass concentration

Figure 2. The interaction effects of variables on FPOX activity. (A) Effect of tryptone and yeast extract. (B) Effect of tryptone and K2HPO4. (C) Effect of tryptone and lactose. (D) Effect of K2HPO4 and yeast extract. (E) Effect of lactose and tryptone. (F) Effect of K2HPO4 and lactose

Table 5. Comparison of IPTG and lactose induction protocol for expression of recombinant FPOX
Figure 3. Comparison of FPOX activity in IPTG-inducible and lactose-inducible methods

Figure 4. SDS-PAGE analysis of lactose-inducible expression. Lane M: Protein marker. Lane 1: Whole cell lysate of E. coli producing recombinant FPOX before optimization. Lane 2: Whole cell lysate of E. coli producing recombinant FPOX after optimization of lactose-inducible expression


Discussion
Techniques for producing enzymes in the lab are seldom suitable for producing enzymes on a large industrial scale. Although costs are not a significant factor in small-scale enzyme production, they become a major obstacle when scaling up for large-scale enzyme production (18).
In this paper, we discuss a method that enables the affordable manufacturing of recombinant FPOX through a lactose-based expression system. This expression system is frequently utilized because of its numerous benefits (18). Our batch strategy enabled us to express enzymes by utilizing lactose as an inducer. In addition, through a precise choice of the host organism, affordable mineral media could be utilized. Moreover, the enzyme titers achieved fall within the same range as those of commonly employed IPTG-inducible expression systems. Under ideal conditions, the biomass concentration reached 49.0 g/L, which is higher than the 22.0 g/L achieved through the IPTG induction protocol. The target enzyme's expression was higher during the lactose induction process than with the IPTG method. Therefore, it can be inferred that using lactose for induction improves enzyme expression better than using IPTG.

Conclusion
In summary, PBD and RSM methods were used to screen and optimize seven variables to identify the key factors influencing FPOX activity. Findings showed that yeast extract (10.12 g/L), tryptone (13.44 g/L), K2HPO4 (2.62 g/L), and lactose (12.79 g/L) resulted in the highest FPOX activity (28.77 U/mL), indicating increased production of recombinant FPOX. Together, the design of experiment methodology is an effective technique for enhancing the lactose-inducible fermentation of FPOX in E. coli.

Acknowledgement
This article is derived from a research project supported by Qazvin University of Medical Sciences.

Funding sources
Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran, provided financial support for this study.

Ethical statement
This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Qazvin University of Medical Sciences with an approval code of (IR.QUMS.REC.1401.286).

Conflicts of interest
The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Author contributions
This article is the result of a research project (No. 401000249) at Qazvin University of Medical Sciences. Dr. Hamid Shahbazmohammadi supervised and was responsible for conducting the research.
Article Type: Research | Subject: Biochemistry

References
1. Ogawa N, Kimura T, Umehara F, Katayama Y, Nagai G, Suzuki K, et al. Creation of haemoglobin A1c direct oxidase from fructosyl peptide oxidase by combined structure based site specific mutagenesis and random mutagenesis. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):942. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
2. Shahbazmohammadi H, Sardari S, Lari A, Omidinia E. Engineering an efficient mutant of Eupenicillium terrenum fructosyl peptide oxidase for the specific determination of hemoglobin A1c. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2019;103(4):1725-35. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
3. Chen KJ, Wang CH, Liao CW, Lee CK. Recombinant fructosyl peptide oxidase preparation and its immobilization on polydopamine coating for colorimetric determination of HbA1c. Int J Biol Macromol. 2018;120(Pt A):325-31. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
4. Hsieh KM, Lan KC, Hua WL, Chen MK, Jang LS, Wang MH. Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) affinity biosensors withring-shaped interdigital electrodes on impedance measurement. Biosens Bioelectron. 2013;49:450-6. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
5. Kim S, Miura S, Ferri S, Tsugawa W, Sode K. Cumulative effect of amino acid substitution for the development of fructosyl valine-specific fructosyl amine oxidase. Enzyme Microb Technol. 2009;44(1):52-6. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
6. Miura S, Ferri S, Tsugawa W, Kim S, Sode K. Development of fructosyl amine oxidase specific to fructosyl valine by site-directed mutagensis. Protein Eng Des Sel. 2008;21(4):233-9. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
7. Hatada M, Saito S, Yonehara S, Tsugawa W, Asano R, Ikebukuro K, et al. Development of glycated peptide enzyme sensor based flow injection analysis system for haemoglobin A1c monitoring using quasi-direct electron transfer type engineered fructosyl peptide oxidase. Biosens Bioelectron. 2021;177:112984. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
8. Singh P, Singh Shera S, Banik J, Mohan Banik R. Optimization of cultural conditions using response surface methodology versus artificial neural network and modeling of L-glutaminase production by Bacillus cereus MTCC 1305. Bioresour Technol. 2013;137:261-9. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
9. Shahbaz Mohammadi H, Mostafavi SS, Soleimani S, Bozorgian S, Pooraskari M, Kianmehr A. Response surface methodology to optimize partition and purification of two recombinant oxidoreductase enzymes, glucose dehydrogenase and D-galactose dehydrogenase in aqueous two-phase systems. Protein Expression Purifi. 2015;108:41-7. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
10. Khayet M, Cojocaru C, Zakrzewska-Trznadel G. Response surface modeling and optimization in pervaporation. J Membr Sci. 2008;321(2):272-83. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
11. Ashrafi-Saiedlou S, Rasouli-Sadaghiani M, Samadi A, Barin M, Sepehr E. Aspergillus niger as an eco-friendly agent for potassium release from K- bearing minerals: isolation, screening and culture medium optimization using Plackett-Burman design and response surface methodology. Heliyon. 2024;10(7):e29117. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
12. Moore B, Georgakis C, Antoniou C, Khattak S. A two-phase approach optimizing productivity for a mAb-producing CHO cell culture process using dynamic response surface methodology models. Biochem Eng J. 2024;201:109137. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
13. Abdullah R, Ahmad S, Nisar K, Kaleem A, Iqtedar M. Response surface methodology as an approach for optimization of alpha amylase production by using bacterial consortium under submerged fermentation. Kuwait J Sci. 2024;51(3):100220. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
14. Mutanda I, Zahoor, Sethupathy S, Xu Q, Zhu B, Shah SWA, et al. Optimization of heterologous production of Bacillus ligniniphilus L1 laccase in Escherichia coli through statistical design of experiments. Microbiol Res. 2023;274:127416. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
15. Wardah ZH, Chaudhari HG, Prajapati V, Raol GG. Application of statistical methodology for the optimization of l-glutaminase enzyme production from Streptomyces pseudogriseolus ZHG20 under solid-state fermentation. J Genet Eng Biotechnol. 2023;21(1):138. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
16. Sharma P, Sharma N. RSM approach to pre-treatment of lignocellulosic waste and a statistical methodology for optimizing bioethanol production. Waste Manage Bull. 2024;2(1):49-66. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
17. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T. Molecular Cloning: A laboratory manual. 2nd ed. New York:Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory press;1989. [View at Publisher] [Google Scholar]
18. Shahbazmohammadi H, Omidinia E. Medium optimization for improved production of dihydrolipohyl dehydrogenase from Bacillus sphaericus PAD-91 in Escherichia coli. Mol Biotechnol. 2017;59(7):260-70. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Clinical and Basic Research

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).